Perhaps you think it's impossible to score another 1,000% gain off this "tech titan" stock. Think again. An unusual strategy lets you virtually "recreate" gains off the biggest companies you thought had come and gone. CLICK HERE to see how it works.
How to Supersize Your Profit Potential From 60% to 190%
by Karim Rahemtulla, Advisory Panelist
Tuesday, September 1, 2009: Issue #1081
Investing in options means speculating, right? A hit-and-miss approach to the market?
Sadly, that’s what some options naysayers would like you to believe – and if you do, let me set the record straight…
Investing in anything carries a certain amount of speculation – be it stocks, options, coins, fine art, or any number of other things.
Over the past decade, for example, we’ve seen that even investing in some so-called “safe” blue-chip stocks has proved to be a speculative bet. In fact, it’s carried greater financial risk than investing in LEAP options could ever pose. Over the past year alone, if you had a portfolio of LEAP options in lieu of a stock portfolio, you’d have come out way ahead of the game.
The thing is, though, some “experts” scoff at the fact that owning options can actually mitigate risk. They tend to focus on the speculative aspect, volatility, risk and the perceived complexity.
They’re wrong. Listen up and I’ll show you exactly what the rest of Wall Street fails to understand – and doesn’t want you to know…
Tune Out the Skeptics… The Benefits of LEAP Options
In recent columns, I’ve highlighted the benefits of using LEAP options – long-term options that not only allow you to capture the movement of the underlying stock, but do so within a period of up to three years. Plus, you don’t even have to own or short the shares directly.
At this point, most simpletons point out the speculative aspect. But I’d argue that the only reason why LEAPS fall into this category is because they will expire one day. However, expiration isn’t really an issue if you don’t hold them that long, or actually make money on the investment!
In truth, LEAPS fit well with a conservative investment style because it’s another tool to mitigate risk in a portfolio. Here’s how it works:
- Let’s say you think the stock market will recover in the next 18 months or so.
- To play the recovery, you want to go long on one of the market’s heavyweight blue-chip stocks like Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW), which tends to move with economic growth.
- Dow’s 52-week trading range swings pretty wildly – from a low of $6 (as investors fled from stocks en masse earlier this year) to a high of $40. The stock is currently sitting around the middle of that range – $22.
- That means if you were to buy 1,000 shares, you’d fork over $22,000.
- Let’s say your target price is $35 by January 2011. On the downside, if you used a 25% stop-loss, you’d exit the stock at $16.50 or lower. In dollar terms, that’s a $5,500 loss.
Bottom Line: You’re willing to risk losing $5,500 in hopes of making $13,000 ($35 target minus the $22 current price = $13), or 60%.
LEAPS: Lower Cost… Lower Risk
Now let’s see how the above compares to using a LEAP option strategy…
Remember, our target time period is January 2011. Pull up the options chain for that expiration month and you’ll see that the DOW $22.50 LEAP call option (VDO-AX) is currently trading for $3.60. This is known as the strike price – the price at which you have the right to buy the shares at options expiration (of course, you could sell the option before that date).
To control the same number of shares as our stock position (1,000), you’d therefore have to buy 10 option contracts (since one contract is comprised of 100 shares). So your outlay would be $3,600 ($3.60 multiplied by 100 = $3,600).
That means you’ve got a pretty compelling twin benefit…
- Right off the bat, you can see that your total risk in this trade is $3,600, versus the $5,500 you’d be willing to lose with a 25% stop-loss on the regular stock position.
- By only risking $3,600, that’s $18,400 less than you’d have spent buying the shares outright – money you could use for other things. For example, if you put it in an account that earned 3% interest, you’d offset your LEAP option cost by $1,000 over the course of the trade.
Now for the profit potential…
Stocks vs. LEAPS: 60% Profits vs. 190% Profits
By going using LEAPS, your cost to control the DOW shares is $26.10.
We arrive at that number by simply adding the option premium ($3.60) to the strike price ($22.50).
Using the $35 target price, you can see that the potential profit is $8.20 per contract ($35 strike price minus the $26.10 cost). So for the 10 contracts (1,000 shares), that works out to $8,200 – a 190% return on your money ($8.20 divided by $4.30).
So let’s recap…
- The Stock Investment: Buying DOW shares outright means you’re looking to make $13,000 (60%)… but you have to invest $22,000 to do it, and you’re risking a $5,500 loss if the position goes against you.
- The LEAP Investment: By executing a LEAP option play, you stand to make $8,200 (190%)… but you only invest $3,600.
That’s not only mitigating your risk, but also boosting your profit potential. Perfect for any market – but particularly the current one.
Karim Rahemtulla
Editor’s Note: This is the perfect example of how a LEAP option strategy can lower your cost, lower your risk and provide a huge upside return. And it’s something that Karim does all the time in his 400 Report VIP service – which is dedicated exclusively to trading LEAP options. The best part? When you sign up, you won’t have to figure anything out – Karim will recommend the plays and do all the work for you.
- LEAPS vs. Stocks: An Investment Vehicle Throwdown
- LEAP Options: Put Time on Your Side With This Trading Strategy
- The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX): Using The Fear/Greed Index to Pinpoint Your Best Time to Profit
|
The Company Set to Dominate a $60 Billion-a-Year Market
$60 billion is spent on cancer treatment in the U.S. - each year. And one company is poised to receive the lion's share of it.
The medical director at the Alta Bates Comprehensive Cancer Center says, "...possibly a third of our cancer patient population will soon be undergoing this [company's] treatment."
Another doctor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center says he intends to treat over 1,000 patients a year with this technology.
Here's how you can claim your stake in the company before this cash infusion sends shares soaring.
13 Responses to “How to Supersize Your Profit Potential From 60% to 190%”
Comments
**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.Check out our selection of daily Investment Research:
 |
 |
Karim Rahemtulla is one of the country’s foremost specialists in options trading and Investment Director of Mt. Vernon Research, as well as the founder and editor of Strategic Income, The 400 Report and Investment U. 
Investment U RSS Feed
September 1st, 2009 at 8:50 am
Your math doesn’t add up! If the option is 3.60 per 100-share contract, isn’t that 36.00? Or is it 3.60 per share? and then, isn’t the profit potential 35.00 less (22.00+3.60) = 8.90? Please explain.
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 8:53 am
I question your math on the article sent today on leaps, $35 strike price less the $26.10 cost gives an $8.90 profit. To calculate the % gain it is the proceeds, $8,900 less the original investment of $3,600 divided by the original investment or (8900-3600)/3600. I think the %gain is 147%.
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 9:14 am
I think the 35 minus 26.10 math says 8.90 per contract, not 8.20
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 9:51 am
I have been a paid subscriber (at cost of ~$1200) to the 400 Report Service since May of this year. I executed every recommendation within hours of its release. I have lost money thus far, and none of my current holdings appear profitable at this moment. I am making some money on covered calls, which I entered based on Karim’s earlier general explanations, and further reading of articles from other sources on the internet, and my own efforts.
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 10:35 am
Hummm. Risk $5,500 to make a possible $13,000 with stocks or risk $3,600 to make a possible $8,200 with LEAPS. Sounds like stocks are the better risk/reward ratio (13/5.5 = 2.36 vs 8.2/3.6 = 2.28).
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 11:18 am
I paid $1295. for 1 year on 6/22/09 and like your service so far, although I havn’t cashed in any gains yet. Since you are now offering added 90 days free, how about extending my 1 yr service for an additional 90 days????
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Where does the 8.20/4.30 come from? I may be wrong but it seems to me that the math should be as follows:
8.90 (35-26.10, potential profit) / 3.60 (cost of LEAP per share) = 247% potential profit
Even better than the article stated.
Thanks, Alan
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 1:39 pm
If the stock stays at $22 or goes up to $24, am I not screwed with the Leaps ?? However, if I own the stock, I still have my original investment. Please respond, even if only by email. Thanks.
Reply
September 1st, 2009 at 4:20 pm
I did my calculations and Could not figure it out.
Thanks for posting all the comments.
I am interested in some other LEAP examples.
Jan Louisse
Reply
September 2nd, 2009 at 4:12 am
According to Mr. Rahemtulla:
“… So your outlay would be $3,600 ($3.60 multiplied by 100 = $3,600).”
3.60 * 100 = 360.00. The correct statement is:
3.60 USD * 100 sh/contract = 360 USD/contract;
360 USD/contract * 10 contracts = 3600 USD to call 1000 sh.
Reply
September 2nd, 2009 at 11:43 pm
I’m guessing Karim wrote the article several days ago and then someone (editor-in-chief?) asked an underling to update the figures using the prior days numbers and that person screwed up the math and no-one bothered to double-check him/her. I do find it interesting that a couple of current subscribers haven’t made any money using Karim’s service. Have the picks been bearish?
Reply
September 5th, 2009 at 5:46 am
WOW!
Sounds a real thrill.
If true, of course!
Karim must be sitting on a pile of money, is all this is that easy, and works as described.
However, I have not see his name among the top richest/major league investors, nor among the “fat cats”. Karim, how much out of your own pocket you put into this game? Please enlighten us!
Ah, not to forget – the math is wrong, correct % is 147%, and not 190%. This is net; minus commissions, slippage (inevitable), transaction fees, etc, will go to less than 130%…
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
I agree the math is wrong and the potential LEAP profit is 147% not 190%. As one comment implied, if the stock goes up a lot then the gains are enhanced with a LEAP. Conversely, if the stock goes down more that $3.60/ share, losses with LEAP mitigated.
Reply