Position Sizing: Why Not Using This Strategy Is The Best Way to Lose Everything
by Alexander Green, Chairman, Investment U
Investment Director, The Oxford Club
Friday, August 8, 2008: Issue #835
Back when I was still managing money 10 years ago, I had a client who transferred in a rather sizable account.
There was only one problem. Over 90% of his net worth was tied up in a single stock, Ericsson. He refused to use a trailing stop or sell a share of it or even to use a position sizing strategy.
I warned him it was crazy to have his entire financial future riding on one stock, especially since he was retired.
“That’s what everybody keeps telling me,” he said. “But the stock keeps going up. I’m glad I ignored them all.”
I congratulated him that the stock had appreciated so nicely. But I reminded him there might come a time when it didn’t do so well. But he was stubborn. He wouldn’t part with a share. Furthermore, he grew weary of having the same conversation. He transferred his account out again.
You may already know how this story ends. From a high of over $105 in March 2000, Ericsson took a breathtaking dive. It traded at less than $5 two years later. This is the kind of mistake - especially when you’re already retired - from which recovery is simply not possible. However, I sometimes see other investors making similar mistakes.
Every so often a reader will come up to me at an investment conference and proudly announce, for example, that he has his entire IRA invested in one of my stock recommendations. This is meant as a compliment, I realize. He wants to show me he has confidence in my stock selections.
But it makes me cringe inside…
Properly Diversify With Basic Position Sizing
Just as the Ericsson shareholder failed to diversify properly, so do many investors who fail to follow our basic position sizing strategy.
You shouldn’t put more than 4% of your equity portfolio in any single stock. (At least initially, anyway. It may grow to be a much larger percentage. But that’s fine as long as you protect your profits with a trailing stop.)
Here’s why you should follow this advice, especially if you consider yourself risk averse:
- Our policy is never to let a stock fall more than 25% below our purchase price without selling it.
- If you take the maximum loss (25%) on your maximum position size (4%), it means the value of your stock portfolio has fallen just 1%.
- And if you have no more than 60% of your portfolio in equities, as we currently recommend, the maximum potential harm done by a single stock cratering is this: Your total portfolio is worth six-tenths of a percent less.
Most grandmas could live with that.
How to Maximize Returns & Limit Risk
Everything we do - asset allocation, trailing stops, position-sizing and stock selection - is done with an eye to not only maximizing returns but also limiting risk.
It’s fine if an individual stock grows to become a significant percentage of your total portfolio, provided you are running a trailing stop behind it to protect your profits.
But don’t let your confidence in any stock - or any stock picker - allow you to abandon basic money management principles.
As Thomas Jefferson once remarked, “In matters of style, swim with the current. In matters of principle, stand like a rock.”
Good Investing,
Alex
Editor’s Note: With his risk-averse money management rules, Alexander Green’s stock recommendations have handily beaten the Wilshire 5000 Total Stock Market Index for five years and counting. The Hulbert Financial Digest recently ranked his performance 3rd overall in the country for a risk-adjusted five-year return. To get his specific stock recommendations, simply become an Oxford Club member today. Alex not only shows you what and when to buy, but when to sell, too.
Today’s Investment U Crib Sheet - Trailing Stops in Action
- In May of last year, Alex recommended Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (NYSE: ATW) to Oxford Club members at $31.34.* After climbing to $63.46,* it pulled back from its high. (* Split adjusted)
- When ATW hit our 25% trailing stop three weeks ago, members locked in a 50% gain. Take a look…
- Our exit was a good thing, too. Since members cashed out, the stock has lost an additional 10%.
- To combine this sell strategy with all of the Club’s growth-stock recommendations, consider joining the Oxford Club today.
 |
The World's Safest, Smartest Oil Play. Period.
Oil stocks are too volatile. Futures are just too risky. But certainly there has to be some way to capitalize on oil's 105% run-up.
There is.
It's a "secret" oil investment that most Americans know nothing about. Yet it's practically "guaranteed" to hand you a steady stream of income for months to come. You could easily make more than $600 every month.
And this report shows you how.
Related Articles:
- Using Trailing Stops: The True Art of Selling Stocks
- Trailing Stops: Lock In Your Profits with This Not-So-Secret Sell Strategy
- Why Doing Nothing is the Right Investment Strategy
9 Responses to “Position Sizing: Why Not Using This Strategy Is The Best Way to Lose Everything”
Comments
**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.Check out our selection of daily Investment Research:
August 13th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
[...] - Position Sizing: Why Not Using This Strategy Is The Best Way to Lose Everything: Issue [...]
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:57 am
[...] Stop “losing your marbles” and learn that the key to success - and the strategy you should use in your portfolio - is position sizing. [...]
September 11th, 2008 at 11:07 am
[...] Position Sizing: Why Not Using This Strategy Is The Best Way to Lose Everything [...]
September 11th, 2008 at 11:19 am
[...] Green showed us that position sizing is just as important, and that by not using a strategy for reducing your risk to any one stock is [...]
September 12th, 2008 at 8:52 am
[...] Class B shares allow investors to profit from Buffett without investing their entire portfolio. Even investment gurus can get it wrong. Alex Green warned us that investing your entire portfolio in any stock, no matter how great, is the best way to lose everything without position sizing. [...]
October 13th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
[...] Position Sizing: Why Not Using This Strategy Is The Best Way to Lose Everything [...]
November 3rd, 2008 at 10:31 am
[...] The Best Way to Lose Everything addthis_url = [...]
May 7th, 2009 at 10:17 am
[...] Green showed us that position sizing is just as important, and that by not using a strategy for reducing your risk to any one stock is [...]
June 5th, 2009 at 10:41 am
[...] how much to invest in each and every situation is crucial to building long-term wealth. Position-sizing ensures that even if a number of our investments turn sour, we won’t lose our shirts. As a [...]