How You Might Grab a Cool 16% Per Year… Even While Underperforming the S&P
by Marc Lichtenfeld, Senior Analyst, Investment U
Thursday, March 24, 2011: Issue #1476
I recently received an e-mail from a reader in his fifties who plans to retire in four years. He told me he’s just getting started in investing and wanted some ideas for “rapid growth.”
Yikes!
Hopefully, he’s got a large 401K, a pension, or an inheritance. Four years isn’t enough time to get your finances ready for retirement if you’re starting from scratch.
While I like a good speculation as much as anyone, the reader’s approach flies in the face of how to make serious money in the markets.
In fact, at the annual Investment U Conference in St. Petersburg, Florida this week, I’ll be giving a presentation on this very topic.
And right off the bat, I can tell you one thing…
The Dividends Statistics Speak for Themselves
If you’re investing in stocks for the long term, the best thing you can do is buy stable companies with a track record of increasing their dividends and then reinvest those dividends.
Sure, they may only be 3% or 4% dividends, but you’ll be shocked at the way they can create significant wealth. I’ll show you exactly what I mean in just a moment, but first, check out these eye-popping statistics on reinvested dividends:
- From 2000 to 2010, reinvested dividends were responsible for 87% of the S&P 500′s total return.
- From 1990 to 2010, reinvested dividends were responsible for 43% of the S&P 500′s total return.
- From 1871 to 2003, reinvested dividends were responsible for 97% of the stock market’s total returns.
Let’s dig deeper…
What Dividend-Paying Companies Are Telling You
The first question to ask yourself when investing in dividends is whether you want stocks that are Dividend Aristocrats, or Dividend Achievers.
- A Dividend Aristocrat is an S&P 500 company that has raised its dividend every year for the past 25 years.
- A Dividend Achiever has raised the dividend for the past 10 years.
By raising the dividend, company executives are telling you two things…
- They’re Committed to Shareholders: By returning capital to shareholders, companies are rewarding your faith in their business. Look at it this way: If you invested in your brother-in-law’s restaurant and the business was doing well, at some point, you’d expect him to start writing you checks. The same thing should hold true for the stocks you invest in.
- They’re Confident: Raising the dividend payment shows investors that the company’s management is confident in their business now and in the future. It also shows that they take their dividend policy seriously. Executives are keenly aware that Wall Street doesn’t like dividend cuts – and investors tend to punish dividend-choppers accordingly.
And of course, if you receive more dividends every year, your yield on cost (i.e. the yield on the price you originally paid) rises. For example, if you buy a $50 stock with a $2 annual dividend, your yield is 4%. But five years later, if the dividend has risen to $3, your yield on cost is 6%, even if the share price has doubled to $100.
So what’s the best way to go about investing in dividend-yielding stocks?
Are You Looking at These Two Crucial Numbers? You Should Be…
After you’ve identified a Dividend Aristocrat or Achiever, you want to be sure the company can continue to pay its dividend.
You can do that by examining its payout ratio – the percentage of net income that is paid out in dividends. (And when it comes to determining income, I prefer to use levered free cash flow, as it’s much harder for a company to manipulate the numbers.) Generally speaking, you want the payout ratio to be 75% or less. That gives the company plenty of room to still pay the dividend if net income or cash flow decrease in any given year.
So once you’re pocketing healthy dividends, why should you then reinvest them? Simple…
A 16.4% Return While Underperforming the S&P 500
Here’s a great example of the power of compounding reinvested dividends. It comes from one of my favorite stocks – Genuine Parts Co. (NYSE: GPC).
Genuine Parts has increased its dividend every year for the past 55 years! That’s an extraordinary record. To put that in perspective, the last time it didn’t raise its dividend, President Eisenhower was in office, Elvis made his television debut on the Louisiana Hayride and The Lawrence Welk Show premiered.
Needless to say, Genuine Parts is a strong performer. Over the past 10 years alone, its share price has doubled. And I expect it to keep rising, as earnings are projected to grow by more than 12% per year for the next five years.
But for the sake of our example, let’s assume that shares only rise by 9% per year – less than the 9.6% average return of the S&P 500 over the past 50 years.
Let’s say you bought 200 shares today (with GPC’s current share price around $52.70, that would cost you $10,540), reinvested the dividend and the dividend increased by 6.8% per year (the average of the past 27 years)… what would happen? After 10 years, your original $10,540 investment would be worth $27,851, growing by an average of 16% per year – even while the stock underperformed the S&P 500 by over half a percentage point.
I used the underperformance figure simply to illustrate a point. I actually expect Genuine Parts to outperform the S&P 500 over the next decade.
Now imagine if you have a portfolio of Aristocrat stocks doing the same thing. If you had a portfolio worth $100,000 and it had the same parameters of the Genuine Parts example above, but your portfolio simply matched the performance of the S&P, your $100,000 would nearly triple in 10 years.
And the power of compounding really gets going in the following decade, as your investment would soar to $891,000. That compares with $208,000 after 10 years and $520,000 after 20 years if you didn’t reinvest the dividend.
Unfortunately, for the reader I mentioned at the top, this is a long-term strategy and wouldn’t get him to his goals in four years. But if you have a longer timeframe, reinvesting in quality dividend stocks is an excellent strategy for creating wealth.
Good investing,
Marc Lichtenfeld
How You Might Grab a Cool 16% Per Year... Even While Underperforming the S&P,Any investment contains risk. Please see our disclaimer.
10 Responses to “How You Might Grab a Cool 16% Per Year… Even While Underperforming the S&P”
Comments
By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.
Check out our selection of daily investment research:
 |
 |
Marc is a senior analyst at Investment U. His investment career started out at the trading desk of Carlin Equities in San Francisco, CA, where he executed dozens of trades each day for his clients.
When you discuss reinvesting dividends, do they have to be reinvested in the same stock they originated from or can the dividends be reinvested in a different dividend paying stock?
Reply
Jake,
In the example that Marc used to show the power of compounding the dividends, you would need to reinvest the dividend in the same stock. That would also save you some money by not having to pay commissions every time you bought shares.
However, you could use the dividends received to buy another stock. Buy you may not have enough capital in the first few quarters or years to buy the second stock. But that could be a decent way of further diversifying your portfolio.
Thanks for writing,
Investment U
Reply
You speak to my age old question. I have been moving more towards dividends and MLPs because of “growth” & retirement income.
How can we as investors get the lists of dividend paying stocks that are solid companies, raise their dividends, etc.
I have liked Genuine Parts for some time.
Thanks,
Reply
Norman,
The Ultimate Income Letter, which is the free mid-month publication received by subscribers of the Oxford Club Communique, has a portfolio of high quality dividend stocks. For more information on the Oxford Club, please visit http://www.oxfordclub.com. You can also do an online search for dividend aristocrats.
Investment U
Reply
Do you need 10 stocks to achieve that?
Reply
Adiaha,
The example above uses just Genuine Parts. But it is almost always better to be diversified across a group of stocks.
Investment U
Reply
i guess at 79, this is not for me. correct?
Reply
I’d like to run the numbers … please let me know what tax rate you used, and what current dividend yield you plugged in.
I’m getting a higher balance at the end of 10 years, thus my confusion …
Reply
ML,
The figures in the above example were pre-tax. Marc didn’t include a tax rate in the calculation. The dividend payment on GPC is $1.80 per year. In the example, Marc assumed it increases by 6.8% per year.
Thank you,
Investment U
Reply
Is there a link to the list you reference?
Reply