The American Recovery Project: A Strong Economy Starts With Strong Infrastructure

by David Fessler, Energy and Infrastructure Expert
Friday, July 2, 2010: Issue #1294

“Every problem is just an opportunity in disguise.”

Given my optimistic nature, that’s my mantra.

And I saw plenty of “the problem equals opportunity” equation on a 175-mile bike ride through Cape Cod last weekend. The event was a fundraiser for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the sorry state of the roads on our route was apparent. Our team spent much of its energy dodging potholes.

But it wasn’t just the local roads that were pock-marked. About half of the Interstate roads between the Cape and my home in Pennsylvania were in bad need of attention, too. It seems to get worse every year.

My advice? Get used to lousy roads. And the reason is simple…

State Budget Blues

Most state budgets are so far underwater that fixing roads isn’t even on their radar screens.

Yes, I saw some repairs being made. But I passed by several other roadwork projects that looked as though they’d been abruptly halted. No workers, no equipment, nothing happening.

And it’s not just the roads that are suffering either. State parks, recreation areas and other services are all falling victim to dwindling state revenues.

And when you learn that every state except Vermont has some form of law that requires them to balance their budgets every year, it’s no wonder that state comptrollers are tearing their collective hair out.

In January, data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) – a government spending policy think-tank – indicated that 40 states projected 2010 budget deficits totaling $33.9 billion.

Fast-forward six months and things have gotten worse. A lot worse…

A $200 Billion Black Hole

The latest numbers from the CBPP show that 48 states are dealing with a combined budget shortfall of $200 billion this year.

Do the math and you’ll see that this is a 490% surge in just six months.

It’s also the largest collective state budget gap on record at the CBPP.

And for 2011? Don’t be fooled by the current budget gap estimate of $112 billion. While it looks better, that number is likely to rise as tax revenue continues to fall amid a still-raw economic recovery and the national unemployment rate hovering close to 10%.

Services Down… Taxes Up

States were able to close some of their 2009 and 2010 gaps via federal funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). But with just $40 billion remaining, that funding source is nearly tapped out.

So with less federal money available to close state funding gaps, what’s the solution?

Well, by law, budget gaps need to be closed. But with federal assistance and state revenue shrinking, most Americans can expect a further curtailment of state-related services.

On top of that, it will come as no surprise to see taxes raised.

Unemployed citizens represent a double-whammy to the system. Not only aren’t they paying taxes, they’re receiving benefits that are draining state coffers.

A Mess Out West

Perhaps the worst example of state budget management is in California. Its economy stands as the eighth-largest in the world… but the state has been broke for the past two years.

It’s tried to stay afloat by borrowing more money, furloughing workers and raising various fees. But it’s done nothing more than kick the proverbial can down the road. The state’s 2011 fiscal year began on Wednesday with a $19 billion budget deficit.

And incredibly, it still has no viable budget framework from which to operate.

“American Recovery and Reinvestment Act… Part Two”

Without additional help from the federal government, U.S. states will face an ugly fiscal abyss.

The ensuing dramatic steps that they’ll be forced to take to shrink their deficits could shave as much as a full percentage point off U.S. GDP next year. And in turn, that could trigger as many as one million additional layoffs in 2011.

It’s a real mess. And to head off the next potential Armageddon, my guess is that the federal government will just pony up more money to the states for several more years.

Call it “ARRA – Part Two” or whatever you want. But the bottom line is we’re a long, long way from “economic recovery.”

To be fair, some of the ARRA money that states have received has gone towards infrastructure projects. But most of the companies performing the work are just using existing workers, rather than hiring new ones.

Here’s what we really need: a focus on industries that can truly create new jobs.

And if you’re a regular reader, you’ll know where I’m going with this…

The Manhattan Project… Energy and Infrastructure-Style

I’m talking about a concerted effort on energy and energy-related infrastructure.

Specifically, weaning ourselves off our obsession with foreign oil is leading the list of needs. Let’s call it the energy and infrastructure sectors’ version of the Manhattan Project (which was a U.S.-led operation to develop atomic bombs during World War II amid fears that Nazi Germany was doing the same.)

That means developing areas like wind power, increasing solar installation, manufacturing more electric cars and shifting towards natural gas as a transitional fuel for cars.

Keep the money and the jobs here and states won’t have to worry as much about where the revenue will come from. After all, a strong economy starts with strong consumers. And they can’t consume if they don’t have jobs.

If you want your portfolio to have some exposure to the infrastructure sector, consider the biggest and best engineering firms like Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (NYSE: JEC) and Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR).

Watch the press releases that these firms (and others like them) put out, as they can provide clues that infrastructure spending is ramping up – and where the money is going.

Good investing,

Dave Fessler

More on this topic (What's this?)
Natural Gas, the New King of Energy
America: Energy Self-Sufficient By 2030
Read more on Energy at Wikinvest
Any investment contains risk. Please see our disclaimer


Related Investment U Articles:

5 Responses to “The American Recovery Project: A Strong Economy Starts With Strong Infrastructure”

  1. Brian Smith Says:

    How many ‘wind mills’ how many ‘solar panels’ how much ‘green alternatives’ is it going to take to replace oil, coal and or natural gas? If everyone would quite forcing this ‘green’ crap down our thoats and started using proven and less expensive resources the better off we will all be. What are you going to do when 100 million people come from work or ‘looking for jobs’ and plug their cars in to ‘refuel’? Where is all that energy going to come from ‘WIND MILLS?’

    Reply

  2. Stan Sexton Says:

    You didn’t mention that besides declining income tax, property tax and sales tax revenues to govt entities of all sizes,a huge problem is exorbitant pensions in the public sector. We will have to wait until the Grekk Trajedy comes to our shores for that to be corrected. Look for more and more states and municipalities to declare BK to control spending. When I look at unfilled potholes, all I see is some early retired govt worker getting a pension between 120 and 240k per year. These pensions will still be paid when you no longer can go to your local library or have to give up other essential services.

    Reply

  3. Jerry D. Lammers Says:

    Dear Mr. Fessler,

    Though I’m very inclined toward energy independence, I think the best spot for a government investment in jobs is high speed rail that’s as good as Europe’s or Japan’s.

    Blessed Be, Jerry D. Lammers

    Reply

  4. William Landrigan Says:

    I am a Canadian and I just can’t believe how ill informed North Americans are about Wind Power! Recently everyone has been screaming about the 1600+ ducks that died in oil pond in the Cdn. oil sands. EVERY MONTH, MORE THAN 25,000 BIRDS ARE KILLED BY WIND MILLS!!! To top that Wind Power is far from reliable! It is time people stopped running all over the place spending Billions of dollars on other power sources that do harm and start putting all that money into R&D until we come up with a proper, reliable, solution!

    William

    Reply

  5. Carl Mandernacht Says:

    Your article say to curtail the use of foreign oil but your list of alternatives don’t mention DOMESTIC oil or nuclear power. This country is, or could be, awash in domestic oil but the current administration not only discourages new exploration, it tries to shut down gulf oil platforms (results of court case still pending)and endangers the jobs of 40,000 to 100,000 -pick a number you believe- oil workers and ancillary industries that depend on the oil jobs. All the while touting “green” jobs that are non-existent or need to be subsidized so heavily that they cost more than is sustainable. Ask Spain about the cost of their Wind Mill program -that they had to abandon. I’m with Mr. Brian Smith. Alternative energy sources may be and should be developed but the only viable sourceS right now are coal and OIL, OIL, OIL!

    Reply

Comments

**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.

Check out our selection of daily Investment Research:



IU Blackboard IU Archives


David Fessler, Energy & Infrastructure Expert

David Fessler is the energy and infrastructure expert for Investment U.

He's a degreed Electrical Engineer and before retiring at the age of 47, David served as Vice-President for Strategic Business at LTX Corporation. He was also Vice-President of Operations, Sales & Marketing for Quality Telecommunications, Inc. and now owns two successful businesses.

His success as an investor spans over 35 years in the energy and technology sectors and David is also a noted specialist in the semiconductor and telecommunications sectors. Learn More...

What is Investment U?

Founded in 1999, Investment U publishes the free Investment U Daily newsletter, along with many other products designed to help investors make better decisions with their money.

Recent Articles


Investment U Weekly Update



Search Investment U:



What Readers Are Saying...

“Your Investment U letters are gradually taking effect on me. I’m less interested in goofy numbers, more interested in intelligent strategy. Thank you for a sane, even-handed vision of the political and financial environments.”
Helen H.

“Thanks for this newsletter. One of the best yet. Realistic, balanced, informative, not full of contradictions or sales pitches. Grateful for the honest approach (admitting not knowing everything about the subject, so we can make our own decisions). Wonderful stuff.”
Mike P.

Questions? Comments? Feedback?