The FDIC’s $20.9 Billion Problem

by Martin Denholm, Senior Editor, Investment U
Wednesday, February 24, 2010

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – better known as the FDIC – has a big problem.

Actually, it’s got 702 big problems.

In figures just released, the number of so-called “problem banks” (and that’s putting it mildly in some cases) surged by 27% during the fourth quarter of 2009.

As of December 31, 2009, a total of 702 banks fell into the “problem” category – up from the 552 institutions at the end of Q3 2009. It was the largest jump since 1992. Together, they represent $402.8 billion in assets – a 16% rise over the $345.9 billion in the previous quarter.

A further 20 banks have fallen by the wayside in 2010, on top of the 140 in 2009. To put that in perspective, just 28 banks went bust in 2007 and 2008.

And the FDIC – the government institution charged with insuring $13.1 trillion worth of Americans’ deposits in case of bank failures – is now buckling under the enormous weight of these problem assets.

A Bloated Deficit for Consumers… But Fat Profits for Banks

For the second straight quarter, the FDIC remained mired in deficit territory – a deficit that has now spiralled to $20.9 billion. That’s more than double the deficit in the previous quarter.

So you wouldn’t expect the FDIC chief, Sheila Bair, to strike an optimistic tone. Yet there she is, boldly stating, “Consistent with a recovering economy, we saw signs of improvement in industry performance.”

Hmm… I’ve heard of putting a positive spin on things, but that’s bordering on delusional. (Although, I guess it helps that the FDIC has a $500 billion credit line available from the U.S. Treasury Department.)

It’s a fact that a large chunk of the banks’ “improvement” – at least in terms of the $12.5 billion in combined 2009 profits that they reported (up 177% over 2008) – stems from this: their ability to borrow money for practically zero interest, then turn around and dump it into higher-yielding investments, rather than lending it to businesses and consumers. (My colleague Mark Skousen also pointed this out in his recent Investment U column.)

Give those CEOs a bonus! Oh, yeah… many of them got one – courtesy of that performance, plus taxpayers’ bailout money, of course.

As far as the FDIC is concerned, it may grab more power, as part of the overhaul to the financial system and new regulations. The House has already passed a bill, which gives the FDIC more authority to deal with failing, non-banking institutions, plus those whose recklessness threatens the financial system. A version of the bill is currently being drafted for the Senate, too.

Best regards,

Martin Denholm

More on this topic (What's this?)
FDIC Votes 3-2 to Limit Banker Compensation
FDIC Report
Read more on Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) at Wikinvest
Any investment contains risk. Please see our disclaimer


Related Investment U Articles:

Comments

**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.

Check out our selection of daily Investment Research:



IU Blackboard IU Archives


What is Investment U?

Founded in 1999, Investment U publishes the free Investment U Daily newsletter, along with many other products designed to help investors make better decisions with their money.

Recent Articles


Investment U Weekly Update



Search Investment U:



What Readers Are Saying...

“Your Investment U letters are gradually taking effect on me. I’m less interested in goofy numbers, more interested in intelligent strategy. Thank you for a sane, even-handed vision of the political and financial environments.”
Helen H.

“Thanks for this newsletter. One of the best yet. Realistic, balanced, informative, not full of contradictions or sales pitches. Grateful for the honest approach (admitting not knowing everything about the subject, so we can make our own decisions). Wonderful stuff.”
Mike P.

Questions? Comments? Feedback?