Timing the Market: If Only You Knew What Mark Hulbert Knows…
by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, April 26, 2010: Issue #1246
For over a decade, I’ve been telling readers that timing the market isn’t just unhelpful… it actually hurts performance.
Now the evidence is even more definitive…
Sure, it’s easy to look back and see exactly when you could have been in or out of the market for maximum performance. That’s the beauty of hindsight.
But when you look ahead, things get a whole lot cloudier. So if you’re even thinking about jumping in or out based on some guru’s system or “market outlook,” listen up…
Trying to Time the Market? Don’t Do It!
The Journal of Financial Economics, an academic journal, recently published a new study – “Measuring Investor Sentiment With Mutual Fund Flows.”
Using easily available public information published by the Investment Company Institute, a mutual fund trade organization, the researchers focused on investor exchanges out of stock funds into bond funds and vice-versa.
This led to an interesting discovery…
- The research shows that market timers, as a group, have god-awful instincts. In fact, you could hardly find a better investment system than to do EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what they’re doing.
- The researchers built a hypothetical portfolio going all the way back to 1984 and switched back-and-forth between the S&P 500 and 90-day T-bills. They did the mirror opposite of what mutual fund flow figures showed switchers were doing.
- Over the next 25 years, the portfolio produced an annual return of 12% – 1.6% a year better than merely buying and holding the S&P 500.
To put this in concrete terms, buy-and-holders turned a $10,000 initial investment (with dividends reinvested) into $118,639 over the period.
Those who did the opposite of mutual fund timers, however, turned the same $10,000 into more than $170,000. (Most fund switchers, on the other hand, did about as well as someone betting on black or red at the roulette wheel.)
That’s not the best part, however…
An Impressive Performance… For Serious Contrarians Only
What makes these numbers even more impressive is that the contrarian portfolio took on far less risk than being fully invested in stocks. After all, it was invested in riskless T-bills nearly half the time.
I’m not actually recommending that you follow this strategy, incidentally. For one thing, past performance – as every investment prospectus reminds you – does not guarantee future results.
Plus, 25 years as a portfolio manager and investment writer have proved to me that the overwhelming majority of investors lack the emotional discipline to invest contrary to the crowd. (So when the chips are down, you may still be out.)
As Mark Hulbert, editor of the independent Hulbert Financial Digest, concludes, the average investor “would be far better off if he never engaged in market timing.”
We don’t agree with this. And it shows in our results…
Good investing,
Alexander Green
Related Investment U Articles:
- The Best Buy Signal of 2012
- Why Money Managers Fail to Beat the Market
- Follow The Wall Street Pros if You Want to Lose Money
- Why Burton G. Malkiel is More Right Than Wrong
- What I Learned From Warren Buffett, John Templeton and Peter Lynch
Comments
**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy. |
 |
Alexander Green is the Chief Investment Strategist of Investment U. A Wall Street veteran, he has more than 20 years of experience as a research analyst, investment advisor, financial writer and portfolio manager.
