Comments on: Global Warming, Greenhouse Gas Emission Restrictions and Cap-and-Trade http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html Investment Advice and Investment Research with a Contrarian Point of View Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:06:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Packers Jersey http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-160320 Packers Jersey Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:05:39 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-160320 Thanks for this. I really like what you’ve posted here and wish you the best of luck with this blog! Thanks for this. I really like what you’ve posted here and wish you the best of luck with this blog!

]]> By: The Most Promising Geothermal Energy Investment | http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-124781 The Most Promising Geothermal Energy Investment | Sat, 16 Jul 2011 01:12:39 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-124781 [...] Friendly: You can’t get much greener than geothermal. There’s no pollution, no greenhouse emissions and the cooled water is re-injected back to where it came from via a second [...] [...] Friendly: You can’t get much greener than geothermal. There’s no pollution, no greenhouse emissions and the cooled water is re-injected back to where it came from via a second [...]

]]> By: How to Profit From the Geothermal Energy Push | Proinvests.com http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-35631 How to Profit From the Geothermal Energy Push | Proinvests.com Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:39:24 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-35631 [...] Investment U: Global Warming: How to Profit From Greenhouse Gas Emission Restrictions & Incentives [...] [...] Investment U: Global Warming: How to Profit From Greenhouse Gas Emission Restrictions & Incentives [...]

]]> By: How to Profit From Geothermal Energy Push | Daily Commodities http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-35617 How to Profit From Geothermal Energy Push | Daily Commodities Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:08:12 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-35617 [...] Friendly : You can’t get much greener than geothermal. There’s no pollution, no greenhouse emissions and the cooled water is re-injected back to where it came from via a second [...] [...] Friendly : You can’t get much greener than geothermal. There’s no pollution, no greenhouse emissions and the cooled water is re-injected back to where it came from via a second [...]

]]> By: tt http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26807 tt Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:43:24 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26807 I concur William. Recent research is far more conclusive that solar and cosmic energy have the dominant effect on our atmospheric cloud cover, and that the data on reduced cloud cover, increasing the amount of direct sun energy on the earth's surface, is very likely the primary cause of our current glogal warming. Additionally, recent peer reviews of the tree ring evidence that was used in support the CO2 hypothesis exposed that many additional data samples within the same region were excluded from the research, and had they been included, the data would no longer support the CO2 hypothesis. This still leaves us with other good reasons to shift humanity to less risky and less damaging sources of energy. In doing so, we need to choose wisely, and avoid wasting time and resources, lest we not head in the right directions while there still is some time and some resources to allocate. Unfortunately we are gaining speed in the wrong directions. So as long as truth is so easily suppressed from broader audiences, there is little chance we will alter course. I concur William. Recent research is far more conclusive that solar and cosmic energy have the dominant effect on our atmospheric cloud cover, and that the data on reduced cloud cover, increasing the amount of direct sun energy on the earth’s surface, is very likely the primary cause of our current glogal warming.
Additionally, recent peer reviews of the tree ring evidence that was used in support the CO2 hypothesis exposed that many additional data samples within the same region were excluded from the research, and had they been included, the data would no longer support the CO2 hypothesis.
This still leaves us with other good reasons to
shift humanity to less risky and less damaging sources of energy.
In doing so, we need to choose wisely, and avoid wasting time and resources, lest we not head in the right directions while there still is some time and some resources to allocate.
Unfortunately we are gaining speed in the wrong directions. So as long as truth is so easily suppressed from broader audiences, there is little chance we will alter course.

]]> By: Jack Barr http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26698 Jack Barr Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:02:36 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26698 The author appears oblivious to the cooling we've experienced over the past 10 years. And to publish a chart from the EPA is highly suspect as are all stats published by government agencies. And no mention of water vapor as the number one heat trapping gas? Sounds like a shill for Waxman-Markey to me. The author appears oblivious to the cooling we’ve experienced over the past 10 years. And to publish a chart from the EPA is highly suspect as are all stats published by government agencies. And no mention of water vapor as the number one heat trapping gas? Sounds like a shill for Waxman-Markey to me.

]]> By: admin http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26699 admin Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:11:53 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26699 Charles, Robert's contacts are telling him that significant developments are being made on the alage front. That's good fodder for a future article! Thanks, Investment U Charles,

Robert’s contacts are telling him that significant developments are being made on the alage front. That’s good fodder for a future article!

Thanks,

Investment U

]]> By: James L. Atchison http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26669 James L. Atchison Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:02:18 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26669 Global warming is a hoax set up to make some people like Al Gore rich trading carbon credits. Unfortunately, many people like you have bought into the idea and perpetuate the myth by agreeing with it. Check the facts! In the last decade CO2 emissions have increased while temperatures have gone down. Global warming is a hoax set up to make some people like Al Gore rich trading carbon credits. Unfortunately, many people like you have bought into the idea and perpetuate the myth by agreeing with it. Check the facts! In the last decade CO2 emissions have increased while temperatures have gone down.

]]> By: Stan van den Dungen http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26649 Stan van den Dungen Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:12:23 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26649 Why pump CO2 into the ground?? There seems to be a way to make money on this. Simply by making fuel of the stuff, I once read an article about a company which uses a bio catalyst proces to convert CO2 into fuel, but I cannot find the companies name, for which I am sorry. Why pump CO2 into the ground?? There seems to be a way to make money on this. Simply by making fuel of the stuff, I once read an article about a company which uses a bio catalyst proces to convert CO2 into fuel, but I cannot find the companies name, for which I am sorry.

]]> By: A D Fielding http://www.investmentu.com/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26628 A D Fielding Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:54:49 +0000 http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/global-warming.html#comment-26628 Climate Change a/k/a global warming & global cooling have existed for thousands of years and occurs in cycles. Of the two climate change phenomenon, warming & cooling, warming is the less serious and less destructive Cooling has resulted in civilizations and cultures being disrupted and destroyed. No evidence or history of warming having the same effects. Kessler is wrong on so many points that it would take pages to refute his allegations, so a couple of the most egregious need mentioning. Water vapor, not CO2, is the most important and abundant greenhouse gas. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is so small that it is generally referred to as a "trace gas". There is 100 times more water vapor in the atmosphere than CO2. 96% of atmospheric CO2 is from natrural, not "man made" sources. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a plant food and aerial fertilizer. Higher CO2 levels helps trees, crops and all green things grow faster and larger, produce more fruit, use water more efficiently and resist stress from real air pollution. It also boosts the protein content of wheat, rice and legumes and the antioxidant content of citrus amd other fruit. Atmospheric warming stopped in 1998 and has in reality been cooling for the last couple of years. In the last 100 years the atmosphere has warmed 0.06 degrees Celsius. Hardly any cause for concern. If Investment U is going to rely on individuals like Kessler to make investment recommendations, then I will cease to read it and take it seriously. You gentlemen that produce Investment U are way to intelligent to fall for the "global warming" alarmism hoax. Keep up the good advice but distance yourselves from alarmist whackos like Kessler. Climate Change a/k/a global warming & global cooling have existed for thousands of years and occurs in cycles. Of the two climate change phenomenon, warming & cooling, warming is the less serious and less destructive Cooling has resulted in civilizations and cultures being disrupted and destroyed. No evidence or history of warming having the same effects.
Kessler is wrong on so many points that it would take pages to refute his allegations, so a couple of the most egregious need mentioning.
Water vapor, not CO2, is the most important and abundant greenhouse gas. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is so small that it is generally referred to as a “trace gas”. There is 100 times more water vapor in the atmosphere than CO2.
96% of atmospheric CO2 is from natrural, not “man made” sources.
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a plant food and aerial fertilizer. Higher CO2 levels helps trees, crops and all green things grow faster and
larger, produce more fruit, use water more efficiently and resist stress from real air pollution. It also boosts the protein content of wheat, rice and legumes and the antioxidant content of citrus amd other fruit.
Atmospheric warming stopped in 1998 and has in reality been cooling for the last couple of years.
In the last 100 years the atmosphere has warmed 0.06 degrees Celsius. Hardly any cause for concern.
If Investment U is going to rely on individuals like Kessler to make investment recommendations, then I will cease to read it and take it seriously.
You gentlemen that produce Investment U are way to intelligent to fall for the “global warming” alarmism hoax.
Keep up the good advice but distance yourselves from alarmist whackos like Kessler.

]]>