<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Position Sizing: How to Limit Risk and Maximize Gains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html</link>
	<description>Investment Advice and Investment Research with a Contrarian Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Ripley</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16891</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Ripley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16891</guid>
		<description>I have not read Van K Tharps book.  However, based upon a $10,000 portfolio and a 4% limit per stock I would need to have 25 positions.  First of all that is too many stocks to manage effectively and with that small amount invested per stock ($400) any gains would be eaten in trading fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read Van K Tharps book.  However, based upon a $10,000 portfolio and a 4% limit per stock I would need to have 25 positions.  First of all that is too many stocks to manage effectively and with that small amount invested per stock ($400) any gains would be eaten in trading fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephesus</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16868</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16868</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Having read Van K Tharps books &amp; articles previously, found your article lacked clarity. When you were talking about 4% or 1% it appeares that you are talking about &quot;as a percent of your portfolio size&quot; which means on a $100,000 portfolio you could have 25 or 100 stocks or a combination somewhere in-between.
When VKT talks about 1% he usually means risk which would be $1000. This would be divided by the difference between the buy price of the stock &amp; the stop loss to give you the number of shares . The number of shares times the share price would provide your trade size.
Many use a 2/20 rule i.e. max 2% risk max 20% trade size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Having read Van K Tharps books &amp; articles previously, found your article lacked clarity. When you were talking about 4% or 1% it appeares that you are talking about &#8220;as a percent of your portfolio size&#8221; which means on a $100,000 portfolio you could have 25 or 100 stocks or a combination somewhere in-between.<br />
When VKT talks about 1% he usually means risk which would be $1000. This would be divided by the difference between the buy price of the stock &amp; the stop loss to give you the number of shares . The number of shares times the share price would provide your trade size.<br />
Many use a 2/20 rule i.e. max 2% risk max 20% trade size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16859</guid>
		<description>This is great advice if you live in a world with no transaction fees. If, on the other hand, you have $10,000 to invest, then, even if you use a discount broker, those recommended $100 to $400 share purchases must overcome a rake that can be as high as 18% in the form of round trip transaction fees. Given this real world perspective, going to the track compares pretty favorably with trying to build a properly diversified portfolio when you only have $10,000 to invest in the stock market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great advice if you live in a world with no transaction fees. If, on the other hand, you have $10,000 to invest, then, even if you use a discount broker, those recommended $100 to $400 share purchases must overcome a rake that can be as high as 18% in the form of round trip transaction fees. Given this real world perspective, going to the track compares pretty favorably with trying to build a properly diversified portfolio when you only have $10,000 to invest in the stock market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Schiffman</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Schiffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/July/position-sizing-2.html#comment-16856</guid>
		<description>I think you would be hard pressed to substantiate your claim that the stock market favors the investor. While the &quot;market&quot; may gain 9-11% per year over a very long stretch, an analysis of individual investors (taking into consideration taxes, timing, fees, alternative investments, e.g. real estate) would show something far different, I believe. If you have data other than gross generalities, I and your readers would appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you would be hard pressed to substantiate your claim that the stock market favors the investor. While the &#8220;market&#8221; may gain 9-11% per year over a very long stretch, an analysis of individual investors (taking into consideration taxes, timing, fees, alternative investments, e.g. real estate) would show something far different, I believe. If you have data other than gross generalities, I and your readers would appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

