Nucor (NYSE: NUE) & The Golden Dividend Ratio

There has been a lot of talk about value traps recently. With dozens of companies slashing or halting their dividends, many income investors have seen a “double whammy” of lower portfolio values and lower revenues.

And while it’s real easy to find losers, the dividend winners are much harder to find.

Seven that Money Magazine looked at include 3M (NYSE: MMM), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP), Emerson Electric (NYSE: EMR), Nucor (NYSE: NUE), Dover (NYSE: DOV) and Clorox (NYSE: CLX).

These dividend stocks all have something interesting in common – in addition to the fact they’re each raised dividends for at least 25 years. It’s their yield.

The yields on these companies range from 3.1% to 3.8%. Consider it the “golden ratio” of dividends. It laymen’s terms, it’s the amount a company can comfortably pay out while still keeping enough for reinvestment and growth.

Looking at the growth rate of their stocks, the worst performer, 3M, has only returned a 447.1% return over the last 25 years. It’s annualized return of 17.88% still beats the S&P’s (.INX) 16.36%. The best performer from that group, Nucor, has an annualized return of 100.25%.

It should give investors pause about investing only in the highest yielding stocks.

Companies mentioned in this article: MMM, JNJ, PEP, EMR, NUE, DOV and CLX.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Nucor at Wikinvest
Any investment contains risk. Please see our disclaimer


Related Investment U Articles:

Comments

**By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our Comment Policy and Privacy Policy.

Check out our selection of daily Investment Research:



IU Blackboard IU Archives


What is Investment U?

Founded in 1999, Investment U publishes the free Investment U Daily newsletter, along with many other products designed to help investors make better decisions with their money.

Recent Articles


Investment U Weekly Update



Search Investment U:



What Readers Are Saying...

“Your Investment U letters are gradually taking effect on me. I’m less interested in goofy numbers, more interested in intelligent strategy. Thank you for a sane, even-handed vision of the political and financial environments.”
Helen H.

“Thanks for this newsletter. One of the best yet. Realistic, balanced, informative, not full of contradictions or sales pitches. Grateful for the honest approach (admitting not knowing everything about the subject, so we can make our own decisions). Wonderful stuff.”
Mike P.

Questions? Comments? Feedback?