<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is General Motors the Buy of the Decade? PHEVs Part Two&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html</link>
	<description>Investment Advice and Investment Research with a Contrarian Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bo</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-15935</link>
		<dc:creator>bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-15935</guid>
		<description>GM will not survive until its get out front with its product engineering.  This money, just spent , is a political window dressing...  DO THE DAMNED ENGINEERING TO GET COMPETITIVE !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM will not survive until its get out front with its product engineering.  This money, just spent , is a political window dressing&#8230;  DO THE DAMNED ENGINEERING TO GET COMPETITIVE !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Gunnlaugsson</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-14026</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Gunnlaugsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-14026</guid>
		<description>There is no problem with the tecnology. jg

http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/11/09/electric-ford-f-150/
The 4WD PML Flightlink F-150 has a range of approximately 100 miles

http://www.sdearthtimes.com:80/et0101/et0101s14.html
reports that aluminum-air fuel cells can extend the range of an electric van from 75 km using lead-acid batteries to 300 km. They note that the fuel cells are over seven times more energy dense by weight and occupy less than one-seventh of the space of commercial lead-acid batteries. 
*****

compared to lithium-ion and nickel cadmium batteries, the aluminum-air battery provides an estimated 75 times more energy density plus greater output over a longer battery lifetime.&quot; To date, the Aluminum-Power battery has achieved 800Wh/kg [watt-hours per kilogram] with peak currents of 7 amps recorded. Aluminum-Power scientists believe that 4,000/Wh/kg is theoretically possible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no problem with the tecnology. jg</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/11/09/electric-ford-f-150/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/11/09/electric-ford-f-150/</a><br />
The 4WD PML Flightlink F-150 has a range of approximately 100 miles</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sdearthtimes.com:80/et0101/et0101s14.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sdearthtimes.com:80/et0101/et0101s14.html</a><br />
reports that aluminum-air fuel cells can extend the range of an electric van from 75 km using lead-acid batteries to 300 km. They note that the fuel cells are over seven times more energy dense by weight and occupy less than one-seventh of the space of commercial lead-acid batteries.<br />
*****</p>
<p>compared to lithium-ion and nickel cadmium batteries, the aluminum-air battery provides an estimated 75 times more energy density plus greater output over a longer battery lifetime.&#8221; To date, the Aluminum-Power battery has achieved 800Wh/kg [watt-hours per kilogram] with peak currents of 7 amps recorded. Aluminum-Power scientists believe that 4,000/Wh/kg is theoretically possible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe magee</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>joe magee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>Remember this...we&#039;ve refined the IC engine now for over 100 years. We&#039;re not going to come up with a technology that&#039;s going to replace all the conveniences of the IC engine overnight. From what I&#039;ve read in the 40+ responses it looks like a lot of people have forgotten that. I like the concept behind the chevy volt as it is a hybrid that significantly reduces oil/gas consumption, without sacrificing all the benefits of the IC engine. It sounds like a great move in the right direction to me. Remember the main goal....TOTAL 100% INDEPENDENCE FROM FOREIGN OIL. We can&#039;t have our economy dependent on foreign oil, period. There&#039;s too much at stake. Our foreign policy should not and cannot be influenced by foreign oil! It&#039;s time for the US automakers to realize this is their time to reclaim the American auto market and in doing so reclaim America as the true leader of the world as we once were and can be again. I&#039;m rooting for you Ford, GM, and Chrysler! You&#039;ve been the heart and soul of the American economy for 100 years, give or take a few. Now is the time for all good automakers to come to the aid of their country! DETROIT MICHIGAN, WE NEED YOU NOW!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember this&#8230;we&#8217;ve refined the IC engine now for over 100 years. We&#8217;re not going to come up with a technology that&#8217;s going to replace all the conveniences of the IC engine overnight. From what I&#8217;ve read in the 40+ responses it looks like a lot of people have forgotten that. I like the concept behind the chevy volt as it is a hybrid that significantly reduces oil/gas consumption, without sacrificing all the benefits of the IC engine. It sounds like a great move in the right direction to me. Remember the main goal&#8230;.TOTAL 100% INDEPENDENCE FROM FOREIGN OIL. We can&#8217;t have our economy dependent on foreign oil, period. There&#8217;s too much at stake. Our foreign policy should not and cannot be influenced by foreign oil! It&#8217;s time for the US automakers to realize this is their time to reclaim the American auto market and in doing so reclaim America as the true leader of the world as we once were and can be again. I&#8217;m rooting for you Ford, GM, and Chrysler! You&#8217;ve been the heart and soul of the American economy for 100 years, give or take a few. Now is the time for all good automakers to come to the aid of their country! DETROIT MICHIGAN, WE NEED YOU NOW!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UHOOTHEGOSSIP</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-4969</link>
		<dc:creator>UHOOTHEGOSSIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-4969</guid>
		<description>I would hope they succeed but I would not bet on it.  The cost of batterys and GM&#039;s poor reputation for quality and follow through will probably wipe out the funds before they can prove their excellence.  I would bet on Honda&#039;s engineering and execution skills!  Best to run them through bankrupcy and hope they survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope they succeed but I would not bet on it.  The cost of batterys and GM&#8217;s poor reputation for quality and follow through will probably wipe out the funds before they can prove their excellence.  I would bet on Honda&#8217;s engineering and execution skills!  Best to run them through bankrupcy and hope they survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motor bob</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>motor bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>It absolutely amazes me how everyone misses the only real system that works! DEISEL/ELECTRIC. VW has one that has plugin capability and 113 M.P.G.!!!available in 2012. check it out at tdiclub.com. german cars are definitely NOT junk.I also wonder how battery powered cars are going to be heated or cooled, and where does everyone think that electricity comes from?? the internal combustion engine is definitely NOT DEAD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It absolutely amazes me how everyone misses the only real system that works! DEISEL/ELECTRIC. VW has one that has plugin capability and 113 M.P.G.!!!available in 2012. check it out at tdiclub.com. german cars are definitely NOT junk.I also wonder how battery powered cars are going to be heated or cooled, and where does everyone think that electricity comes from?? the internal combustion engine is definitely NOT DEAD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>On the ability of our power grid to handle electric vehicles: blackouts and brownouts are not due to insufficient overall capacity.  They are due to insufficient *peak* capacity.  Peak load on the grid occurs during the middle of the workday, which is when most people have their cars sitting in a parking lot at work.  Electric vehicles would be charging overnight, which is when there is far more capacity available.

On the &#039;death&#039; of the ICE: agreed with other posters that it won&#039;t go away completely.  However, bear in mind that the *vast* majority of drivers drive their cars less than 60 miles a day in the US.  The Volt&#039;s 40 is a bit skimpy, but assuming that 60 miles is well within reach, that would be the deciding factor for a lot of people (along with the ultimate cost of the vehicle, obviously).  Note that this also makes the case stronger for investing in solar panels for one&#039;s home - there are a lot of novel ways to finance them now compared to even five years ago, and the total cost has dropped quite a bit as well.

On the quality of foreign cars: gregt&#039;s expert opinion on &#039;Jap Junkboxes&#039; not withstanding, I beg to differ.  I have only owned Hondas my whole life, I have driven them well north of 250k miles with the only problem being a blown radiator, and my maintenance costs are basically nothing.  If that&#039;s junk, then I guess I love junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the ability of our power grid to handle electric vehicles: blackouts and brownouts are not due to insufficient overall capacity.  They are due to insufficient *peak* capacity.  Peak load on the grid occurs during the middle of the workday, which is when most people have their cars sitting in a parking lot at work.  Electric vehicles would be charging overnight, which is when there is far more capacity available.</p>
<p>On the &#8216;death&#8217; of the ICE: agreed with other posters that it won&#8217;t go away completely.  However, bear in mind that the *vast* majority of drivers drive their cars less than 60 miles a day in the US.  The Volt&#8217;s 40 is a bit skimpy, but assuming that 60 miles is well within reach, that would be the deciding factor for a lot of people (along with the ultimate cost of the vehicle, obviously).  Note that this also makes the case stronger for investing in solar panels for one&#8217;s home &#8211; there are a lot of novel ways to finance them now compared to even five years ago, and the total cost has dropped quite a bit as well.</p>
<p>On the quality of foreign cars: gregt&#8217;s expert opinion on &#8216;Jap Junkboxes&#8217; not withstanding, I beg to differ.  I have only owned Hondas my whole life, I have driven them well north of 250k miles with the only problem being a blown radiator, and my maintenance costs are basically nothing.  If that&#8217;s junk, then I guess I love junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>Hey first off, you are missing the correct information on the Volt.  Please let me correct you.  The Volt will drive 40 +- Miles on Battery Only...THEN...the small Combustion Engine will kick in, and produce electricity...not run the Volt like a traditional Combustion Engine...it will still be highly efficient...I am hoping that the final Combustion Engine part of this is a Flex Fuel Engine.  And you can fill it up as needed whether it is Flex Fuel or Traditional...until you can plug in to recharge...
Then I can buy Ethanol produced by Coskata Process...Ethanol from Garbage, YES Garbage...and we as Americans can MAKE GARBAGE....and we already PAY to transport it...yes another GM Partner...Coskata....Start reading labels and buying what is made in America.  

Also the UAW had already made concessions before the &quot;bailout&quot; funds were given..this new contract had starting wages for new hires at $14/hr, plus benefits, 401k, not traditional &quot;pension&quot; I think it takes effect April 2009...and the &quot;bailout&quot; funds have also now taken out the jobs bank.  GM/UAW had agreed to shift all the Health Fund responsibilty to the UAW, GM had to pay a huge number of Billions into a fund..but much of the legacy costs were already starting to be dealt with BEFORE the &quot;bailout&quot; even started.  

Have you driven in one of the 100 GM Fuel Cell Vehicles being tested on the Road?  The are in DC, LA...these have been being tested by all sort of normal folks for the last year...

Take a Positive View...Take a Positive Attitude..

Personally if I could afford to buy a brand new Chevy Suburban LTZ and take to to the wizard of Witchita...and have it made into a BioDiesel Electric like Neil Young (Old Lincoln Continental) and Arnold Swartzeneger (His Jeep Wagoner) did..I would do it in a heartbeat...This guy turned a Hummer into a 50mpg vehicle...BioDiesel...

I would love a 100mpg Chevy Suburban...the Suburban is an outstanding vehicle for a family.

Yes Telsa are cute...but the battery replacement after 100K Miles is somewhere between $19,000 and $24,000.  And who will recycle these batteries?  

 Fisker has a couple of nice sports cars that get up and go...and go quite a ways on All Electric...

I still think Flex Fuel...Ethanol from Garbage is the way to go...can be made for about $1/Gallon here in the US...from OUR Waste...how cool is that..
There are also a bunch of other Ethanol processes that don&#039;t use Corn and food sources...they use basically garbage or left overs from other processes..these are so simple to embrace..

http://www.coskata.com/

Thermal Solar Plants in Neveda Daytime Power Generation, a Plant that was 90 square miles in size would power the US...Geothermal Plants taping into hot springs and even Lava flows....24/7/365 Electricity...Solar on Homes...Fuel Cells at Homes...Wind Generators where they work..

Change all your Bulbs to LED Bulbs ( Cree-Lighting ReInvented, Permlight, go to 1000.bulbs.com and look) or to Dim-able CFL Bulbs...save 70-90% of your lighting bills...our house is completely LED 2700˚K...and just great..

Conservation, New LED Bulb Technology, Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Thermal Solar...these will all take loads off the Grid..

Start using your dollars and brains to make a difference..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey first off, you are missing the correct information on the Volt.  Please let me correct you.  The Volt will drive 40 +- Miles on Battery Only&#8230;THEN&#8230;the small Combustion Engine will kick in, and produce electricity&#8230;not run the Volt like a traditional Combustion Engine&#8230;it will still be highly efficient&#8230;I am hoping that the final Combustion Engine part of this is a Flex Fuel Engine.  And you can fill it up as needed whether it is Flex Fuel or Traditional&#8230;until you can plug in to recharge&#8230;<br />
Then I can buy Ethanol produced by Coskata Process&#8230;Ethanol from Garbage, YES Garbage&#8230;and we as Americans can MAKE GARBAGE&#8230;.and we already PAY to transport it&#8230;yes another GM Partner&#8230;Coskata&#8230;.Start reading labels and buying what is made in America.  </p>
<p>Also the UAW had already made concessions before the &#8220;bailout&#8221; funds were given..this new contract had starting wages for new hires at $14/hr, plus benefits, 401k, not traditional &#8220;pension&#8221; I think it takes effect April 2009&#8230;and the &#8220;bailout&#8221; funds have also now taken out the jobs bank.  GM/UAW had agreed to shift all the Health Fund responsibilty to the UAW, GM had to pay a huge number of Billions into a fund..but much of the legacy costs were already starting to be dealt with BEFORE the &#8220;bailout&#8221; even started.  </p>
<p>Have you driven in one of the 100 GM Fuel Cell Vehicles being tested on the Road?  The are in DC, LA&#8230;these have been being tested by all sort of normal folks for the last year&#8230;</p>
<p>Take a Positive View&#8230;Take a Positive Attitude..</p>
<p>Personally if I could afford to buy a brand new Chevy Suburban LTZ and take to to the wizard of Witchita&#8230;and have it made into a BioDiesel Electric like Neil Young (Old Lincoln Continental) and Arnold Swartzeneger (His Jeep Wagoner) did..I would do it in a heartbeat&#8230;This guy turned a Hummer into a 50mpg vehicle&#8230;BioDiesel&#8230;</p>
<p>I would love a 100mpg Chevy Suburban&#8230;the Suburban is an outstanding vehicle for a family.</p>
<p>Yes Telsa are cute&#8230;but the battery replacement after 100K Miles is somewhere between $19,000 and $24,000.  And who will recycle these batteries?  </p>
<p> Fisker has a couple of nice sports cars that get up and go&#8230;and go quite a ways on All Electric&#8230;</p>
<p>I still think Flex Fuel&#8230;Ethanol from Garbage is the way to go&#8230;can be made for about $1/Gallon here in the US&#8230;from OUR Waste&#8230;how cool is that..<br />
There are also a bunch of other Ethanol processes that don&#8217;t use Corn and food sources&#8230;they use basically garbage or left overs from other processes..these are so simple to embrace..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coskata.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.coskata.com/</a></p>
<p>Thermal Solar Plants in Neveda Daytime Power Generation, a Plant that was 90 square miles in size would power the US&#8230;Geothermal Plants taping into hot springs and even Lava flows&#8230;.24/7/365 Electricity&#8230;Solar on Homes&#8230;Fuel Cells at Homes&#8230;Wind Generators where they work..</p>
<p>Change all your Bulbs to LED Bulbs ( Cree-Lighting ReInvented, Permlight, go to 1000.bulbs.com and look) or to Dim-able CFL Bulbs&#8230;save 70-90% of your lighting bills&#8230;our house is completely LED 2700˚K&#8230;and just great..</p>
<p>Conservation, New LED Bulb Technology, Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Thermal Solar&#8230;these will all take loads off the Grid..</p>
<p>Start using your dollars and brains to make a difference..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Juhala</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Juhala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>In reading the above 46 responses to the PHEV article, it is clear that many are rife with gross misconceptions.  To understand the place the electric vehicle can and will have in our society one needs first to know that the average RT commute in the US, for example, is roughly 40 miles.  Therefore, the EV will be largely a commute vehicle for many years.  With 100M EVs in operation we will be completely independent of foreign oil.

Concerning the necessary installed electric power capacity to recharge these EV&#039;s, it needs to be understood that currently most power plants run at around 20% capacity during the wee hours of the night and in fact could run more efficiently if they could operate at a constant power output 24 hours a day.  In my electric cooperative there is currently enough reserve capacity to recharge an electric vehicle overnight for every single household.  Consequently it will be years if not decades before one single kilowatt of new capacity needs to be installed to handle the recharging of electric vehicles.  

When new electricity producing capacity does need to be added, it should be nuclear.  One (among many) of the great trajedies of the last election is that BO will likely halt all development of nuclear power.  Jimmy Carter did this back in the late 1970&#039;s and put the country 3 decades behind in this industry.  The statement that there is only enough uranium for 30 years is blatantly incorrect.  In fact with the use of nuclear breeder reactors there would be essentially an infinite supply of fissiable nuclear fuel.

Now with regard to battery technology, there is currently one battery that meets every requirement for EV&#039;s and that is the  Altair lithium titanate spinel battery.  Here are the characteristics of this battery: 1)proven absolutely safe (cannot blowup or burn), 2)more than 10,000 deep discharge cycles (thus 30 year lifetime, 3)exhibits no memory, 4)wide operating range of temperatures at high effiency(-20F to above 140F, thus doesn&#039;t need coolers or heaters),
5)rapid recharge(10 Minutes, also overnight as well, 6)high power density(thus can deliver power rapidly.  As with any new battery technolgy, the cost will drop dramatically with mass production.

This battery is currently being tested in vehicles with more than 100 mile range.  Since the average commute is 40 miles RT, EV&#039;s with this battery will satisfy 90% of all commuter trips with plenty of power for accessories,i.e. lights, heating, cooling, etc.

The impression given by GM that the needed battery technolgy is still years away is totally incorrect and has been put forth in my opinion to delay the introduction of EV&#039;s into the market.
That said the EV could truly be the salvation of the US automobile industry if only they would embrace it whole heartedly.

Finally, the idea that the IC engine will disappear any time soon is again false.  People will use their SUV&#039;s, campers, pickup trucks, etc. for vacations and long distance trips for decades, but this only accounts for roughly 10% of the driving requirements.  The EV combined with nuclear energy can usher in the greatest period of prosperity this nation has ever seen.
Unfortunately, we may have to suffer through 4 years of economic retrenchment until this can be realized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading the above 46 responses to the PHEV article, it is clear that many are rife with gross misconceptions.  To understand the place the electric vehicle can and will have in our society one needs first to know that the average RT commute in the US, for example, is roughly 40 miles.  Therefore, the EV will be largely a commute vehicle for many years.  With 100M EVs in operation we will be completely independent of foreign oil.</p>
<p>Concerning the necessary installed electric power capacity to recharge these EV&#8217;s, it needs to be understood that currently most power plants run at around 20% capacity during the wee hours of the night and in fact could run more efficiently if they could operate at a constant power output 24 hours a day.  In my electric cooperative there is currently enough reserve capacity to recharge an electric vehicle overnight for every single household.  Consequently it will be years if not decades before one single kilowatt of new capacity needs to be installed to handle the recharging of electric vehicles.  </p>
<p>When new electricity producing capacity does need to be added, it should be nuclear.  One (among many) of the great trajedies of the last election is that BO will likely halt all development of nuclear power.  Jimmy Carter did this back in the late 1970&#8242;s and put the country 3 decades behind in this industry.  The statement that there is only enough uranium for 30 years is blatantly incorrect.  In fact with the use of nuclear breeder reactors there would be essentially an infinite supply of fissiable nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>Now with regard to battery technology, there is currently one battery that meets every requirement for EV&#8217;s and that is the  Altair lithium titanate spinel battery.  Here are the characteristics of this battery: 1)proven absolutely safe (cannot blowup or burn), 2)more than 10,000 deep discharge cycles (thus 30 year lifetime, 3)exhibits no memory, 4)wide operating range of temperatures at high effiency(-20F to above 140F, thus doesn&#8217;t need coolers or heaters),<br />
5)rapid recharge(10 Minutes, also overnight as well, 6)high power density(thus can deliver power rapidly.  As with any new battery technolgy, the cost will drop dramatically with mass production.</p>
<p>This battery is currently being tested in vehicles with more than 100 mile range.  Since the average commute is 40 miles RT, EV&#8217;s with this battery will satisfy 90% of all commuter trips with plenty of power for accessories,i.e. lights, heating, cooling, etc.</p>
<p>The impression given by GM that the needed battery technolgy is still years away is totally incorrect and has been put forth in my opinion to delay the introduction of EV&#8217;s into the market.<br />
That said the EV could truly be the salvation of the US automobile industry if only they would embrace it whole heartedly.</p>
<p>Finally, the idea that the IC engine will disappear any time soon is again false.  People will use their SUV&#8217;s, campers, pickup trucks, etc. for vacations and long distance trips for decades, but this only accounts for roughly 10% of the driving requirements.  The EV combined with nuclear energy can usher in the greatest period of prosperity this nation has ever seen.<br />
Unfortunately, we may have to suffer through 4 years of economic retrenchment until this can be realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VM</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>VM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>I love how people with no understanding of basic science are forecasting the demise of the internal combustion engine. Instead of wasting his money on GM, the author should buy a physics book so he can learn how outrageously impossible the electric car is on a large scale. And what an environmental disaster it would be, having all that oil being replaced by coal. Or may be he wants to build 4000 new nuclear plants? Either way, there is significant doubt that enough copper exists on the planet (not to mention uranium) to build out the necessary electrical grid. Seems like common sense went out of fashion a long time ago. Next thing you know he&#039;ll be telling us to buy Citi Bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how people with no understanding of basic science are forecasting the demise of the internal combustion engine. Instead of wasting his money on GM, the author should buy a physics book so he can learn how outrageously impossible the electric car is on a large scale. And what an environmental disaster it would be, having all that oil being replaced by coal. Or may be he wants to build 4000 new nuclear plants? Either way, there is significant doubt that enough copper exists on the planet (not to mention uranium) to build out the necessary electrical grid. Seems like common sense went out of fashion a long time ago. Next thing you know he&#8217;ll be telling us to buy Citi Bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Juhala</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Juhala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/general-motors.html#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>In reading the above 46 responses to the PHEV article, it is clear that many are rife with gross misconceptions.  To understand the place the electric vehicle can and will have in our society one needs first to know that the average RT commute in the US, for example is roughly 40 miles.  Therefore, the EV will be largely a commute vehicle for many years.  With 100M EV in operation we will be completely independent of foreign oil.

Concerning the necessary installed electric power capacity to recharge these EV&#039;s, it needs to be understood that currently most power plants run at around 20% capacity during the wee hours of the night and in fact could run more efficiently if they could operate at a constant power output 24 hours a day.  In my electric cooperative there is currently enough reserve capacity to recharge an electric vehicle overnight for every single household.  Consequently it will be years if not decades before one single kilowatt of new capacity needs to be installed to handle the recharging of electric vehicles.  

When new electricity producing capacity does need to be added, it should be nuclear.  One (among many) of the great trajedies of the last election is that BO will likely halt all development of nuclear power.  Jimmy Carter did this back in the late 1970&#039;s and put the country 3 decades behind in this industry.  The statement that there is only enough uranium for 30 years is blatantly incorrect.  In fact with the use of nuclear breeder reactors there would be essentially an infinite supply of fissiable nuclear fuel.

Now with regard to battery technology, there is currently one battery that meets every requirement for EV&#039;s and that is the  Altair lithium titanate spinel battery.  Here are the characteristics of this battery: 1)proven absolutely safe (cannot blowup or burn), 2)more than 10,000 deep discharge cycles (thus 30 year lifetime, 3)exhibits no memory, 4)wide operating range of temperatures at high effiency(-20F to above 140F, thus doesn&#039;t need coolers or heaters).
55)rapid recharge ( 10 Minutes, also overnight as wwell)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading the above 46 responses to the PHEV article, it is clear that many are rife with gross misconceptions.  To understand the place the electric vehicle can and will have in our society one needs first to know that the average RT commute in the US, for example is roughly 40 miles.  Therefore, the EV will be largely a commute vehicle for many years.  With 100M EV in operation we will be completely independent of foreign oil.</p>
<p>Concerning the necessary installed electric power capacity to recharge these EV&#8217;s, it needs to be understood that currently most power plants run at around 20% capacity during the wee hours of the night and in fact could run more efficiently if they could operate at a constant power output 24 hours a day.  In my electric cooperative there is currently enough reserve capacity to recharge an electric vehicle overnight for every single household.  Consequently it will be years if not decades before one single kilowatt of new capacity needs to be installed to handle the recharging of electric vehicles.  </p>
<p>When new electricity producing capacity does need to be added, it should be nuclear.  One (among many) of the great trajedies of the last election is that BO will likely halt all development of nuclear power.  Jimmy Carter did this back in the late 1970&#8242;s and put the country 3 decades behind in this industry.  The statement that there is only enough uranium for 30 years is blatantly incorrect.  In fact with the use of nuclear breeder reactors there would be essentially an infinite supply of fissiable nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>Now with regard to battery technology, there is currently one battery that meets every requirement for EV&#8217;s and that is the  Altair lithium titanate spinel battery.  Here are the characteristics of this battery: 1)proven absolutely safe (cannot blowup or burn), 2)more than 10,000 deep discharge cycles (thus 30 year lifetime, 3)exhibits no memory, 4)wide operating range of temperatures at high effiency(-20F to above 140F, thus doesn&#8217;t need coolers or heaters).<br />
55)rapid recharge ( 10 Minutes, also overnight as wwell)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

