<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dividend-Paying Stocks: 5 Pharmaceutical &#8220;Cash Machines&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investmentu.com/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html</link>
	<description>Investment Advice and Investment Research with a Contrarian Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html#comment-135496</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentu.com/IUEL/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html#comment-135496</guid>
		<description>it is now aug 24 2011 and i am thinking Merck for their estimated 4.9 % dividends...a bit higher than Pfizer.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is now aug 24 2011 and i am thinking Merck for their estimated 4.9 % dividends&#8230;a bit higher than Pfizer.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentu.com/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentu.com/IUEL/2008/September/dividend-paying-stocks-2.html#comment-2481</guid>
		<description>There is obviously a lot more to figure out about this issue, but you made some really good points.  I will definitely be checking here more often.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is obviously a lot more to figure out about this issue, but you made some really good points.  I will definitely be checking here more often.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

